Texture profile analysis is the measurement and description of the textural properties of food. Texture can be measured by a trained sensory panel (organoleptic) or using specialized equipment (instrumental).2
Measurements are made by compressing an item to a set distance and analyzing the force it takes for the item to deform.
Dr. Alina Surmacka Szczesniak developed the original texture profile analysis parameters while working as a food scientist for General Foods in the early 1960s.1 In order to create a common language to describe the texture of food, Szczesniak created a scale with readily available food items to provide an accurate example for each of the categories.2
Brand or Type
hard cooked 5 mins.
Large, uncooked, skinless
Mogen David Kosher Meat Products Corp.
Yellow, American, pasteurized process
Exquisite giant size, stuffed
Cocktail type in vacuum tin
Dryden & Palmer
The original scales had 5 to 7 points. Today’s scales commonly use a 15 point intensity ranking. Adaptations have been made to the original classifications to capture the language needed to describe specific products such as greasiness of potato chips. Textural profile analysis is an evolving tool used to accurately describe the textural characteristics of food or other products. Debate continues over use of a trained sensory panel (organoleptic) vs specialized equipment (instrumentation).
A quantitative scale has been created for each textural attribute.1
The primary categories for texture profile analysis are:
Hardness: the initial force used to deform2
Cohesiveness: how the item holds together2
Viscosity: flow rate2
Elasticity (Springiness): the rate at which a deformed item reforms2
Adhesiveness: rate at which item comes away from probe(instrumental) or roof of mouth/teeth (organoleptic)2
The primary categories can be further broken down into secondary categories:
Resilience: measurement of how a sample recovers from deformation in relation to speed and forces derived.
Brittleness (Fracturability): the initial force needed for a material to fracture2
Chewiness: energy required to chew a solid food until it is ready for swallowing2
Gumminess: energy required to disintegrate a semisolid food until it is ready to swallow2
The primary and secondary categories may be further broken down as needed to define the characteristics in a specific food item.2 For example, mouth coating and melt rate are used to describe ice cream much better than hardness or chewiness.
Using specialized equipment, a food sample is placed in the equipment and compressed. This action mimics chewing and creates the force deformation curve.3 The force of the first bite and the force of the second bite are measured against the amount of deformation of the food sample for analysis.3 All textural attributes are analyzed by the instrument software. The food samples must be prepared in exactly the same way to get consistent results. The test is usually repeated up to 15 times for statistical accuracy.4
Textural profile analysis testing is also known as the “Two Bite Test.” The test mimics the mouth’s biting activity allowing analysis of how food responds when chewed. The Two Bite testing method allows for multiple textures to be analyzed in one test. The test results are plotted on a graph as seen in figure 1.
TPA Force vs Time (Figure 1)5
The force vs time graph (Figure 1) shows the force peak resulting from each compression cycle. This is a typical 2-cycle TPA curve obtained from any load bearing instrument. While the force vs distance graph (Figure 2) better displays the response of the sample to the application and removal of strain. The following are typical measurements obtained from a TPA curve5:
Springiness: Ds / Dt
Chewiness: (B1/A1) x P1 x Ds
Gumminess: P1 x B1/A1
Texture profile analysis is used to accurately describe the textural characteristics of food. This technique provides a universal language for food scientists, vendors, sales staff, and customers. Knowing the textural profile of a product can determine the attributes that increase consumer liking.
Szczesniak, Alina Surmacka, Margaret A. Brandt, and Herman H. Friedman. “Development of Standard Rating Scales for Mechanical Parameters of Texture and Correlation Between the Objective and the Sensory Methods of Texture Evaluation.” Journal of Food Science 28.4 (1963).
Szczesniak, Alina Surmacka. “Classification of Textural Characteristics.” Journal of Food Science 28.4 (1963).
Peleg, M. “Texture Profile Analysis Parameters Obtained By An Instron Universal Testing Machine.” Journal of Food Science 41.3 (1976).
Otegbayo, Bolanle, Johnson Aina, Lawrence Abbey, Esther Sakyi‐Dawson, Mpoko Bokanga, And Robert Asiedu. “Texture Profile Analysis Applied To Pounded Yam.” Journal of Texture Studies 38.3 (2007).
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.